I couldn't agree more with the previouse comment from anonymous. The forcasting is reality but there is something weird about the date it was posted. Actually I saw these pictures and prediction in this site:http://quake.exit.com or http://www.gisdevelopment.net/proceedings/tehran/p_session2/bam.htm.
Now I can say my accuracy in predictions is more than 80%.
As I predicted a small quake happend in sputh of spain but in the sea with 3.6M, and a 4.5 Quake happend in east of Japan on Honshu sea and the tibbet-nepal Quake that I predicted happend with 5.5M but with some error in location, It happend on 330KM north of Lhasa, Tibbet.
I predicted a quake for Chile, a 4.6M quake happend at that location that I highlighted on the Image of it, it was weaker than what I was predcited, so maybe that cloud was connected to this quake, and if it's like this then my prediction is correct but with a lower magnitude than what I predicted, but if it's not, then I can say still there is chance of another quake with the magnitude that I predicted for that location.
Comments
[url=http://akenviku.com/tupy/pols.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://jzahtnwn.com/fdfl/stns.html]Cool site[/url]
My homepage | Please visit
http://akenviku.com/tupy/pols.html | http://dkbzkwui.com/tiif/gsxn.html